Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Feb 28, 2021 17:58:41 GMT -5
As is teams are able to trade waiver wire pick ups immediately. I'd like to see it to where you have to have those players on your roster for a certain amount of days. (30 is my suggestion)
I'd also like to see WW players picked up after a certain day be locked from trades. (90 is my suggestion)
There's also been some suggestions about what do do with players amnestied after the previous season but before Free Agency. Some would like to put those players into free agency instead of waivers.
Feel free to give your thoughts and reasoning for keeping it the same, changing the rule, or changing it with a different suggestion not listed.
You can select 2 answers. One to the top 3, and one to the bottom 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Feb 28, 2021 18:45:28 GMT -5
Off-season amnesty should go to fa IMO, make waiver contracts the same as fa signings of over a certain amount they have to wait 60 days
|
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Feb 28, 2021 18:49:30 GMT -5
I think the current system is fine, no changes
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Feb 28, 2021 21:11:48 GMT -5
what's the difference between no deadline and season deadline
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 10:51:40 GMT -5
what's the difference between no deadline and season deadline Any players bought out/amnestied after a certain deadline would roll to next season FA. Also trade deadline is currently sim 10. So if we implemented a day amount a WW player needed to be on your team before you could trade them then it would be day 99 minus that number as the as the last day you could pick up a WW player and still trade them. |
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 10:53:39 GMT -5
Off-season amnesty should go to fa IMO, make waiver contracts the same as fa signings of over a certain amount they have to wait 60 days I agree with this. I would say 30 days though. And I’d add any amnesty/buyout after the deadline immediately go to next year free agency. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 1, 2021 16:02:04 GMT -5
what's the difference between no deadline and season deadline Any players bought out/amnestied after a certain deadline would roll to next season FA. Also trade deadline is currently sim 10. So if we implemented a day amount a WW player needed to be on your team before you could trade them then it would be day 99 minus that number as the as the last day you could pick up a WW player and still trade them. so in this proposal we're getting rid of the sim 10 deadline for buyouts? |
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 16:03:13 GMT -5
Any players bought out/amnestied after a certain deadline would roll to next season FA. Also trade deadline is currently sim 10. So if we implemented a day amount a WW player needed to be on your team before you could trade them then it would be day 99 minus that number as the as the last day you could pick up a WW player and still trade them. so in this proposal we're getting rid of the sim 10 deadline for buyouts? I think you could keep the deadline or allow to buyout until end of season. That’s up to you. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 1, 2021 16:40:39 GMT -5
so in this proposal we're getting rid of the sim 10 deadline for buyouts? I think you could keep the deadline or allow to buyout until end of season. That’s up to you. okay let's put aside the days on roster thing for now, it seems like that's separate currently amnesty/buyout can't happen after sim 10 until after playoffs there is one proposal that amnesty/buyout after playoffs before fa bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa there is another proposal that amnesty/buyout at some point before playoffs also bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa that another proposal is what i'm not understanding |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Mar 1, 2021 16:48:21 GMT -5
the problem with amnesty to fa is that you could do it to a player who is still really good after everyone spends their cap and he could end up on an mle
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 16:49:31 GMT -5
the problem with amnesty to fa is that you could do it to a player who is still really good after everyone spends their cap and he could end up on an mle it would be before day 1 FA |
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 16:52:30 GMT -5
I think you could keep the deadline or allow to buyout until end of season. That’s up to you. okay let's put aside the days on roster thing for now, it seems like that's separate currently amnesty/buyout can't happen after sim 10 until after playoffs there is one proposal that amnesty/buyout after playoffs before fa bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa there is another proposal that amnesty/buyout at some point before playoffs also bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa that another proposal is what i'm not understanding “The another proposal” Say the rule is the WW player has to be on your roster 30 days before you can trade him. You then win a waiver on a player day 70. That’s before the trade deadline but due to the 30 day requirement on roster that puts it to day 100 before you could trade him which is obviously after the deadline. |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Mar 1, 2021 16:55:28 GMT -5
What exactly are the problems we're looking to solve for with these changes? Seems most of this is coming from a place of "I don't like how it works" or "that's not how Irl works" - but what exactly are the issues created by the current model?
|
|
bankz
New Member
GM of the Year: 3001
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 490
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by bankz on Mar 1, 2021 16:57:05 GMT -5
What exactly are the problems we're looking to solve for with these changes? Seems most of this is coming from a place of "I don't like how it works" or "that's not how Irl works" - but what exactly are the issues created by the current model? Right on time... |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Mar 1, 2021 17:30:57 GMT -5
okay let's put aside the days on roster thing for now, it seems like that's separate currently amnesty/buyout can't happen after sim 10 until after playoffs there is one proposal that amnesty/buyout after playoffs before fa bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa there is another proposal that amnesty/buyout at some point before playoffs also bypasses the waiver and goes directly to fa that another proposal is what i'm not understanding “The another proposal” Say the rule is the WW player has to be on your roster 30 days before you can trade him. You then win a waiver on a player day 70. That’s before the trade deadline but due to the 30 day requirement on roster that puts it to day 100 before you could trade him which is obviously after the deadline. ohhhhkay so it's a combo with the days/trade thing, that makes more sense |
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 1, 2021 17:32:19 GMT -5
“The another proposal” Say the rule is the WW player has to be on your roster 30 days before you can trade him. You then win a waiver on a player day 70. That’s before the trade deadline but due to the 30 day requirement on roster that puts it to day 100 before you could trade him which is obviously after the deadline. ohhhhkay so it's a combo with the days/trade thing, that makes more sense Yes. I probably wasn’t too clear on that. |
|
|
|
Post by Ankly on Mar 2, 2021 17:52:16 GMT -5
The only teams that should be able to offer are those with soft cap space. If nobody bids, they hit FA.
Seems most straightforward to me.
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Mar 2, 2021 17:54:20 GMT -5
The only teams that should be able to offer are those with soft cap space. If nobody bids, they hit FA. Seems most straightforward to me. that's a different aspect of WW that can be brought up in a different thread. |
|
