|
|
Post by TinyTimPig on Feb 24, 2021 13:47:26 GMT -5
Currently, a player who won a non-rookie award AND has an A- can be a mentor.
I'm of the opinion we should amend mentoring to allow for more players to be mentors, which I think would also mirror real life more accurately.
I think someone should be able to mentor if:
- They win an All-League award and have an A- grade
- They are 30 years or older and have an A- grade
This would allow "great" players (all-league) and "veterans" (30+) to mentor in things they're good at.
Any of these numbers and grades are flexible, but I thought it'd be a good conversation to have.
|
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Feb 24, 2021 13:48:16 GMT -5
i voted no but i would like to see the required grade be dropped to B+
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Feb 24, 2021 14:00:42 GMT -5
agree with Odin
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Feb 24, 2021 14:29:54 GMT -5
I would like to see the use of this expanded.
I also like the idea of it being reduced to B+ but like this proposal.
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Feb 24, 2021 14:30:43 GMT -5
I prefer Odin's solution
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Feb 24, 2021 14:30:54 GMT -5
At least temporarily
|
|
|
|
Post by eric on Feb 24, 2021 14:45:00 GMT -5
Currently, a player who won a non-rookie award AND has an A- can be a mentor. I'm of the opinion we should amend mentoring to allow for more players to be mentors, which I think would also mirror real life more accurately. I think someone should be able to mentor if: - They win an All-League award and have an A- grade - They are 30 years or older and have an A- grade This would allow "great" players (all-league) and "veterans" (30+) to mentor in things they're good at. Any of these numbers and grades are flexible, but I thought it'd be a good conversation to have. if you can post how mentors would have looked under this proposal for last year and, since we're so close, the upcoming year, i think that would help us make a more informed decision |
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 792
Likes: 252
Joined: December 2020
|
Post by IanBoyd on Feb 24, 2021 14:45:40 GMT -5
I want the "previous season's all league awards" portion to be a bit more lenient.
Drop the requirement of the immediate previous season for 30+ older players imo.
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s on Feb 24, 2021 14:51:55 GMT -5
I like the exclusivity. I don't think what this league is missing is more free upgrades.
|
|
|
|
Post by Herby New Year! on Feb 24, 2021 14:59:52 GMT -5
I like the exclusivity. I don't think what this league is missing is more free upgrades. Agree. And even if we do make a chance, remember that Eric has been building these classes based on the upgrades available. If we're going to change the rules to add more upgrades, we should make it effective after the last player in the league now (including the 3002 software) retires. |
|
|
|
Post by TinyTimPig on Feb 24, 2021 15:29:46 GMT -5
Currently, a player who won a non-rookie award AND has an A- can be a mentor. I'm of the opinion we should amend mentoring to allow for more players to be mentors, which I think would also mirror real life more accurately. I think someone should be able to mentor if: - They win an All-League award and have an A- grade - They are 30 years or older and have an A- grade This would allow "great" players (all-league) and "veterans" (30+) to mentor in things they're good at. Any of these numbers and grades are flexible, but I thought it'd be a good conversation to have. if you can post how mentors would have looked under this proposal for last year and, since we're so close, the upcoming year, i think that would help us make a more informed decision I can work on this. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Feb 24, 2021 17:38:08 GMT -5
at the end of 5.0 i checked out what it would look like if the rule were 30+ with A- and an award at any point in the career. it was much fewer than previous year awards. that being said, i do think we need expanded eligible teams because, at least in this case, what worked for 16 teams won't work for 29. i think the best approach is to add the 30+/career award to the existing eligibility.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 24, 2021 17:39:13 GMT -5
i voted no because i prefer to ment amendoring
|
|
|
|
Post by TinyTimPig on Feb 25, 2021 13:57:20 GMT -5
It seems this is not widely desired so I won't bother going through how mentors would've looked with the suggested amendment.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Feb 25, 2021 14:33:49 GMT -5
we should tie mentoring into an age/win share metric, like over 30, 10+ win shares or something
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s on Feb 25, 2021 15:04:05 GMT -5
we should tie mentoring into an age/win share metric, like over 30, 10+ win shares or something Why only old people? There are young coaches all over. Anyone who is good at something has the ability to teach it to someone else. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Mar 1, 2021 13:23:49 GMT -5
dumb idea incoming:
what if the amount of upgrade depended upon the grade of the player doing the mentoring
B+ is +4
A- is +5
A is +6
A+ is +7
|
|
|
|
Post by Trofie on Mar 1, 2021 13:29:34 GMT -5
dumb idea incoming: what if the amount of upgrade depended upon the grade of the player doing the mentoring B+ is +4 A- is +5 A is +6 A+ is +7 I like it |
|
