Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 11:46:25 GMT -5
So we didn't have this happen in 5.0 because LOL a waiting list amirite?
But now that we have a waiting list... I think it's pretty stupid that we will contract a team and then expand a team to bring in a person. It also encourages tanking.
The solution? If someone announces their resignation, allow a member of the waiting list to immediately take their team if they want.
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Jan 28, 2021 11:48:34 GMT -5
Can we give the new GM the choice?
Part of the problem with giving them an existing team is that they are stuck with any/all trades or roster management issues.
Depending on what the previous GM did this could significantly impact the ability of a new GM to do much with the team.
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 11:51:23 GMT -5
Can we give the new GM the choice? Part of the problem with giving them an existing team is that they are stuck with any/all trades or roster management issues. Depending on what the previous GM did this could significantly impact the ability of a new GM to do much with the team.
"if they want". the gm on the waiting list can pass up the team if they dont want it and wait for expansion or go to the next person on the waiting list idc
|
|
bankz
New Member
GM of the Year: 3001
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 490
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by bankz on Jan 28, 2021 12:00:55 GMT -5
I think giving the new GM the choice is the correct call.
|
|
|
|
Post by delap on Jan 28, 2021 12:23:30 GMT -5
I think giving the new GM the choice is the correct call. I, like user Bankz, am pro-choice. |
|
|
|
Post by Herby New Year! on Jan 28, 2021 12:33:18 GMT -5
Team don't auto contract; team give the new GM the option to contract.
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jan 28, 2021 12:45:31 GMT -5
Team don't auto contract; team give the new GM the option to contract. |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jan 28, 2021 12:48:07 GMT -5
How will assets for the said team be handled? Will the GM take over the exact current state of the team? What about skrouse skratch (TM)? Currency is usually set up per GM, not per team. What about upgrades?
|
|
|
|
Post by 20s on Jan 28, 2021 12:50:17 GMT -5
How will assets for the said team be handled? Will the GM take over the exact current state of the team? What about skrouse skratch (TM)? Currency is usually set up per GM, not per team. What about upgrades? IMO currency is the asset of the GM, new guy should get 10k to start like everyone else did. Upgrades are the asset of the team, like draft picks. |
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 12:51:32 GMT -5
How will assets for the said team be handled? Will the GM take over the exact current state of the team? What about skrouse skratch (TM)? Currency is usually set up per GM, not per team. What about upgrades? just like it always was before expansion became the only way: all assets except currency would transfer |
|
bankz
New Member
GM of the Year: 3001
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 490
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by bankz on Jan 28, 2021 12:58:57 GMT -5
How will assets for the said team be handled? Will the GM take over the exact current state of the team? What about skrouse skratch (TM)? Currency is usually set up per GM, not per team. What about upgrades? IMO currency is the asset of the GM, new guy should get 10k to start like everyone else did. Upgrades are the asset of the team, like draft picks. this |
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jan 28, 2021 12:59:05 GMT -5
So the gm would need to understand all that, need like a disclaimer
|
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Jan 28, 2021 12:59:23 GMT -5
How will assets for the said team be handled? Will the GM take over the exact current state of the team? What about skrouse skratch (TM)? Currency is usually set up per GM, not per team. What about upgrades? This is why I think giving them the choice would be the best option. My assumption would be that if the new GM agrees to take-over an existing team they would get that team exactly how it is. As 20's mentioned we can give them 10k to start, unless they have already accumulated skrouse bucks, and they proceed as the new GM. For instance, lets assume Soup decides to not come back and the Mavericks are open. If the new GM decided to take that team as is they would take over the current roster and assets. Any picks that were traded away stay that way and no new picks are added. |
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jan 28, 2021 13:02:46 GMT -5
Team don't auto contract; team give the new GM the option to contract. |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jan 28, 2021 13:21:21 GMT -5
whichever way we go there's not going to be immediate contraction, after the big contraction we probably had as many GMs decide to quit and renege as actually went through with it
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 13:23:01 GMT -5
whichever way we go there's not going to be immediate contraction, after the big contraction we probably had as many GMs decide to quit and renege as actually went through with it
Sure; I was thinking the time limit would stay the same (1 full season of inactivity), but then we just give the new gm the choice to decide between taking teh team or doing an expansion draft.
their choice would have to be made in some reasonable time limit to give people to prepare for the draft
|
|
|
|
Post by TinyTimPig on Jan 28, 2021 14:27:27 GMT -5
Question about how this would work:
In our current system, and I think both of the above proposals, assets that have already been traded will be kept by the team that traded for them. This means that I'll keep the Mavs' 1.15 I acquired in the 3001 draft.
If a new GM comes and takes over the Mavericks and says they want to start from scratch, how would they be slotted into the wheel moving forward? In 5.0 I believe we just slotted them into an empty spot on the wheel, but we don't have a bunch of open spots here. With a 30-team wheel and 29 teams, that gives us a cushion of one, so what happens if 3 more GMs who have traded first round picks quit and they're replaced by 3 new GMs from our waiting list, all of whom want to start from scratch?
|
|
Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
Joined: January 1970
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 14:31:29 GMT -5
Question about how this would work: In our current system, and I think both of the above proposals, assets that have already been traded will be kept by the team that traded for them. This means that I'll keep the Mavs' 1.15 I acquired in the 3001 draft. If a new GM comes and takes over the Mavericks and says they want to start from scratch, how would they be slotted into the wheel moving forward? In 5.0 I believe we just slotted them into an empty spot on the wheel, but we don't have a bunch of open spots here. With a 30-team wheel and 29 teams, that gives us a cushion of one, so what happens if 3 more GMs who have traded first round picks quit and they're replaced by 3 new GMs from our waiting list, all of whom want to start from scratch?
this seems like an issue with the overall system and not just this idea
|
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jan 28, 2021 14:31:32 GMT -5
Question about how this would work: In our current system, and I think both of the above proposals, assets that have already been traded will be kept by the team that traded for them. This means that I'll keep the Mavs' 1.15 I acquired in the 3001 draft. If a new GM comes and takes over the Mavericks and says they want to start from scratch, how would they be slotted into the wheel moving forward? In 5.0 I believe we just slotted them into an empty spot on the wheel, but we don't have a bunch of open spots here. With a 30-team wheel and 29 teams, that gives us a cushion of one, so what happens if 3 more GMs who have traded first round picks quit and they're replaced by 3 new GMs from our waiting list, all of whom want to start from scratch? very good question tim |
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jan 28, 2021 14:39:58 GMT -5
Question about how this would work: In our current system, and I think both of the above proposals, assets that have already been traded will be kept by the team that traded for them. This means that I'll keep the Mavs' 1.15 I acquired in the 3001 draft. If a new GM comes and takes over the Mavericks and says they want to start from scratch, how would they be slotted into the wheel moving forward? In 5.0 I believe we just slotted them into an empty spot on the wheel, but we don't have a bunch of open spots here. With a 30-team wheel and 29 teams, that gives us a cushion of one, so what happens if 3 more GMs who have traded first round picks quit and they're replaced by 3 new GMs from our waiting list, all of whom want to start from scratch? Currently the rules are that "All picks owed by contracted teams will be honored. All picks owed to contracted teams will be voided." Since the rules as written guarantee the owed picks will be honored, this means the expansion team in the same slot as a contracted team will pick after. |
|
