|
Post by eric on Jun 26, 2021 13:45:53 GMT -5
20s andrewluck Ankly b. A. (good 2023) bankz delap Dirt Druce duc15 dump Fason Handsome Pete Herby New Year! IanBoyd jhb @jayz93j kc Majic mazunga Mike Odin Chaps pointyegg Sapular skrouse Soup TinyTimPig Trofie Yawn of the DeadThey enter the wheel at slot 26. For the remaining owed Warriors picks, the Warriors will pick first. They have the option of utilizing an expansion draft 3 PM July 3rd. All protections must be in by the end of playoffs. The following players will be on the free agent list until the end of season but cannot be signed. ID Name Pos Age Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Total 601 Joe Barry Carroll C 27 $15,625,000 $17,187,500 $18,750,000 $20,312,500 $21,875,000 $0 $0 $93,750,000 609 Ed Stokes C 24 $565,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $565,850 624 Aziz N'Diaye C 30 $840,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,850 485 Serge Ibaka PF 21 $4,600,000 $4,900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,500,000 460 James Michael McAdoo PF 21 $2,000,000 $2,150,000 $2,300,000 $2,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,900,000 112 Rodney McCray SF 28 $16,250,000 $17,500,000 $18,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $52,500,000 373 Chandler Parsons SF 24 $2,150,000 $2,300,000 $2,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,900,000 249 Darrell Griffith SG 27 $15,000,000 $16,250,000 $17,500,000 $18,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $67,500,000 425 Mike Gansey SG 26 $840,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,850 434 Matt Milon SG 28 $840,850 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $840,850 474 Juwan Staten PG 36 $18,750,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,750,000 170 Tyler Ennis PG 20 $2,000,000 $2,150,000 $2,300,000 $2,450,000 $0 $0 $0 $8,900,000
Following the season, any player still under contract will go through contraction waivers 3 PM July 4th. All claims must be in 30 minutes before.
|
|
|
Post by Fason on Jun 26, 2021 13:53:16 GMT -5
I’m not using the expansion draft, I’d rather have the cap space. No need for protecting anyone, scout’s honor.
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Jun 26, 2021 13:54:13 GMT -5
fuck man, let me trade my slots first
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jun 26, 2021 17:06:35 GMT -5
Iman Shumpert Jusuf Nurkic Zach Lavine Jabari Parker Darwin Cook
|
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 192
Likes: 61
Joined: June 2021
|
Post by dump on Jun 26, 2021 17:07:20 GMT -5
|
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 192
Likes: 61
Joined: June 2021
|
Post by dump on Jun 26, 2021 17:08:43 GMT -5
Sim Bhullar Donatas Motiejunas Deron Williams Doug McDermott James Young
|
|
|
Post by Druce on Jun 28, 2021 8:19:18 GMT -5
Andray Blatche Nikola Vucevic Jimmy Butler Tobias Harris Mike Conley Dante Exum (slot from Mavs)
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Jun 28, 2021 8:24:33 GMT -5
Roy Hibbert Robert Whaley Anthony Randolph Davis Bertans Antonio Gates Damien Inglis T.J. Warren Diante Garrett Brian Roberts
*4 slots from Mavs*
|
|
|
Post by skrouse on Jun 28, 2021 8:31:33 GMT -5
Michael Beasley Joey Graham Kemba Walker Byron Scott Marcin Gortat
|
|
|
Post by Trofie on Jun 28, 2021 8:34:52 GMT -5
Al Horford Michael Brooks Marshon brooks Rodney Hood
|
|
IanBoyd
New Member
Posts: 792
Likes: 252
Joined: December 2020
|
Post by IanBoyd on Jun 28, 2021 8:44:03 GMT -5
DeAndre Jordan Kenny George Nicolas Batum James Blackmon Jr. Chris Paul
|
|
|
Post by Yawn of the Dead on Jun 28, 2021 8:57:22 GMT -5
Clint Capela Wayne Estes Kevin Love Joe Alexander Marcus Smart
|
|
|
Post by 20s on Jun 28, 2021 9:05:21 GMT -5
Greg Oden Luke Maye Ron Perry Gary Harris Joe Harris
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Jun 28, 2021 9:33:56 GMT -5
eric are the Jazz in the 3009 draft at slot 26?
|
|
|
Post by 20s on Jun 28, 2021 9:38:33 GMT -5
jhb eric looks like they should actually be slot 22 in 3009 draft, that is what the Warriors were Warriors were 15 in 3010 which was traded to the Hornets and that is the spot the Jazz are taking. Year before 15 is 22. Year before that is 26.
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Jun 28, 2021 9:41:13 GMT -5
jhb eric looks like they should actually be slot 22 in 3009 draft, that is what the Warriors were Warriors were 15 in 3010 which was traded to the Hornets and that is the spot the Jazz are taking. Year before 15 is 22. Year before that is 26. I think eric just looked at the wheel thread and it hasn't been updated, still shows the 3008 draft as the next draft and I think that's where he got 26 from.
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jun 28, 2021 12:51:20 GMT -5
jhb eric looks like they should actually be slot 22 in 3009 draft, that is what the Warriors were Warriors were 15 in 3010 which was traded to the Hornets and that is the spot the Jazz are taking. Year before 15 is 22. Year before that is 26. I think eric just looked at the wheel thread and it hasn't been updated, still shows the 3008 draft as the next draft and I think that's where he got 26 from. right, my mistake
|
|
|
Post by Majic on Jun 28, 2021 21:34:43 GMT -5
Don’t want to start more problems but a little annoyed by this and wanted to share.
I have been informed that the Celtics will be a part of contraction bids and will be picking 3rd based on the Warriors record in the 3007 season.
I don’t think that’s particularly fair as they were contracted and filled with FA players. Had the team been forced to play out the season with its true roster it definitely would have had a better record. Just don’t see how a teams record can be cratered due to a contraction and then luck out with a top 3 contract pick because of it.
I am sure nothing will be changed for this contraction as much as I’d like it to as this hurts my chances. Really though it’s the Rockets and Mavs that potentially lose out the most. If it’s not up for discussion on this I’d like to have the rule revised so another team doesn’t benefit.
|
|
dump
New Member
Posts: 192
Likes: 61
Joined: June 2021
|
Post by dump on Jun 28, 2021 21:36:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jun 28, 2021 21:54:50 GMT -5
if any other team had been all FA in 3007 they would have been in a good position for 3008 contraction waivers too though
why would we penalize the celtics when we wouldn't penalize any other team?
|
|
bankz
New Member
GM of the Year: 3001
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 490
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by bankz on Jun 28, 2021 22:15:29 GMT -5
if any other team had been all FA in 3007 they would have been in a good position for 3008 contraction waivers too though why would we penalize the celtics when we wouldn't penalize any other team? No team in the wheel era would be filled with all free agents like the Cs. Feels like the Cs get to double dip unfairly
|
|
|
Post by Odin on Jun 28, 2021 22:18:01 GMT -5
yeah i agree. celtics shouldnt participate.
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Jun 28, 2021 22:37:12 GMT -5
Dump just got his team started and was expansion last year
Stop being pussies
|
|
jhb
New Member
Posts: 1,349
Likes: 396
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by jhb on Jun 28, 2021 22:39:50 GMT -5
No one would have made this argument if it were last year and he was less likely to get a good player.
Which means it’s just a selfish, bad faith argument.
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Jun 28, 2021 22:41:45 GMT -5
lol at counting warriors record as celtics.
Y’all really do like to fuck some shit up.
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Jun 28, 2021 22:43:55 GMT -5
No one would have made this argument if it were last year and he was less likely to get a good player. Which means it’s just a selfish, bad faith argument. It was his team that got contracted. What are you even talking about?
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Jun 28, 2021 22:45:36 GMT -5
if any other team had been all FA in 3007 they would have been in a good position for 3008 contraction waivers too though why would we penalize the celtics when we wouldn't penalize any other team? Teams didn’t get to operate under same rules as warriors/celtics. Was any other team free to drop every player from their roster with no cap penalties?
|
|
|
Post by eric on Jun 28, 2021 22:49:08 GMT -5
if any other team had been all FA in 3007 they would have been in a good position for 3008 contraction waivers too though why would we penalize the celtics when we wouldn't penalize any other team? Teams didn’t get to operate under same rules as warriors/celtics. Was any other team free to drop every player from their roster with no cap penalties? the celtics didn't drop any player from their roster. they were an expansion team and started with a blank roster if you're arguing we shouldn't count the warriors' record for the celtics' waiver position the celtics get a BETTER waiver slot, not a worse one as majic said nothing is changing for this contraction because we don't do post facto rule changes, but if you really want to make that argument for changes going forward you should be aware that in almost every circumstance it will help the expansion team for obvious reasons
|
|
Soup
New Member
Posts: 1,307
Likes: 401
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by Soup on Jun 28, 2021 22:53:39 GMT -5
Teams didn’t get to operate under same rules as warriors/celtics. Was any other team free to drop every player from their roster with no cap penalties? the celtics didn't drop any player from their roster. they were an expansion team and started with a blank roster if you're arguing we shouldn't count the warriors' record for the celtics' waiver position the celtics get a BETTER waiver slot, not a worse one as majic said nothing is changing for this contraction because we don't do post facto rule changes, but if you really want to make that argument for changes going forward you should be aware that in almost every circumstance it will help the expansion team for obvious reasons We don’t do post facto changes even though this was implemented after the season started? “Contraction waiver order is in reverse order of the standings of the last full season before contraction.”
|
|
bankz
New Member
GM of the Year: 3001
Posts: 2,347
Likes: 490
Joined: January 2021
|
Post by bankz on Jun 28, 2021 22:53:43 GMT -5
In cases like this the previous expansion team should have the final selection.
|
|