Quick Hit: Training Camp History (289 views)

[20s]

As suggested by Soup in the 3006 Training Camp thread, I am looking at how Training Camp has gone for each team by each season.  Since I was throwing this together anyway, figured I'd post it in the Articles section and hopefully get some skrouse skratch for it.

Something to keep in mind is this is only the player growth from TC itself.  No grade changes from upgrades or Skill Camps are reflected in these numbers.

[Soup]

35k

[IanBoyd]

75k

[Deleted]

69k

Really interesting stuff.

[bankz]

40K

[eric]

really cool stuff

it's remarkable with how wacky some of the grade calculations are that grade changes still track so linearly with potential, and shown potential at that

[Soup]

Oh wow, was I too low with 35k? Don’t count mine as of now. I’ll change when more people weigh in.

[20s]

May 13, 2021 17:33:02 GMT -5 Soup said:

Oh wow, was I too low with 35k? Don’t count mine as of now. I’ll change when more people weigh in.

No, it’s fine. 

[skrouse]

5K to soup (idea fee)
35K to 20s

[duc15]

70k

[skrouse]

Wonder if the positional trends are related to something other than position, I would like to think so

[Sapular]

70K

[Deleted]

May 13, 2021 18:32:33 GMT -5 skrouse said:

Wonder if the positional trends are related to something other than position, I would like to think so

possibly a function of how eric builds the players -- PG might be closer to ++ cutoffs, while bigs are closer to -- cutoffs. Just a theory.

[eric]

i never look at or care about cutoffs. it's possible by coincidence certain positions are being built closer to certain cutoffs, but my guess with how small the effect is is it's just noise

[Ankly]

I think PGs are inflated due to handling.

 More confused by SFs being so low. Is that perhaps due to the wild method for how SF defense is calculated?

[Trofie]

70k
Can't believe soup is so frugal



Gbr

[jhb]

50k

[andrewluck]

70k. Good stuff, man.